Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tamira Paszek vs Shahar Peer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paszek vs Peer analysis and find out who is favored!
Tamira Paszek vs Shahar Peer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Paszek 1 - 2 Peer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paszek has won 45.49% of points on their second serve, while Peer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paszek, in recent form, has won 59.15% of their opponent's second serve points, while Peer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.64% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paszek has saved 53.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paszek has won 65.71% of matches played (W/L 46/ 24), with Peer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paszek has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 56/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 49/ 47). Peer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 247/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 18/ 23).
- Player level: In the last year, Paszek has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.41% of matches (W/L 38/ 21), where as Peer has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Paszek winning 1 times and Peer being victorious 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Paszek winning 3 and Peer winning 4. The last match between Paszek and Peer was at the U.S. Open - New York, 26-08-2015, Q1 round, Hard with Tamira Paszek getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:36.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paszek and Peer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Paszek winning 0 times and Peer 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Paszek winning 0, and Peer 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paszek has played against opponents with an average rank of 318.94 while Peer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paszek has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paszek has converted 52.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
299
Rank
26
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
1
Hard1
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
11
High
37
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
57% (396-300)
Career Total W/L
58% (388-277)
69% (22-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,345,638
Career Prize Money
$2,894,734
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tamira Paszek | Shahar Peer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 4 |
| Games Won | 36 | 33 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 12 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:36 | 1:27:36 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (103/170) | 64% (92/144) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (69/103) | 53% (49/92) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (27/67) | 44% (23/52) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 79% (11/14) | 50% (8/16) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (41/96) | 42% (45/106) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Tamira Paszek
Player
Shahar Peer
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Tamira Paszek
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tamira Paszek | Shahar Peer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (22/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (46/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (369/286) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 74% (17/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 25 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 70 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:5 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 288.34 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (1377/1953) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (812/1377) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (262/576) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (151/288) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (986/1978) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (15/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (22/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (21/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (21/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tamira Paszek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sonay Kartal
Player
Tamira Paszek
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve %
53%
(
17 of
32)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
40
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Hikaru Sato
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
112)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Maria Martinez Vaquero
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caroline Werner
Player
Tamira Paszek
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Hannah Klugman
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
10
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Mihaela Djakovic
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
2
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
52%
(
29 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Klaudija Bubelyte
Player
Tamira Paszek
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
75%
(
54 of
72)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
75%
(
72 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
65 of
89)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Katarina Stresnakova
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
58%
(
11 of
19)
Break Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
53%
(
47 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
53 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Sophie Drakeford-Lewis
87%
(
54 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
0%
(
0 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Shahar Peer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paula Cristina Goncalves
Player
Shahar Peer
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Kateryna Volodko
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Valeria Gorlats
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
33%
(
19 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Ipek Soylu
Player
Shahar Peer
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
1
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
4
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristyna Pliskova
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
12
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
3
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jana Cepelova
Player
Shahar Peer
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Shahar Peer
74%
(
62 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
10
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Glushko
Player
Shahar Peer
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Paszek Vs Peer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
